From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hayden5650

User:Gerry Lynch openly admitted to homosexuality which immediately sets off alarm bells due to the Homosexual agenda. More specifically, looking at Gerry's editing patterns from May thru June 2006 he edited immensely every day, except on June 3rd 2006, where he only made one edit which coincides with the day of Runcorn's first edit. From then on over the next couple of months, Runcorn seems to focus entirely on adding stubs and cats and all that sort of crap to articles, no doubt for the sole purpose of bringing up contribution numbers, which is naturally followed by credibility. I'm sure if you could cross reference 2 graphs with edits numbers per day running up the 'y' axis and time along the 'x' axis, you would soon very clearly see that low editing periods for one user are matched by high editing periods for the other, and vice versa. --Hayden5650 09:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Interesting indeed. I'm not sure if I get the 'homosexual agenda' comment, unless it shows some familiar editing pattern. But yes, I see your point about contribs - Alison ☺ 09:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)''

Groupthink, obsession with circumstantial evidence, and a little bit of outright homophobia. Nice bunch of peoople they are.

At this stage, someone must be asking why I care? Why not just walk away from Wikipedia and let the college kids and computer geeks on a power trip get on with it? Well, Wikipedia is, like it or not, the most used reference source on the internet. Do a Google search for most people or places and their wikipedia entry is one of the first five hits. Banning from Wikipedia, used cleverly and subtly, could be a way of writing whole shades of opinion into the back pages of public opinion. This is fairly disturbing stuff.

And in the real world, software similar in principle to that used to declare me a sockpuppet is increasingly being used to detect 'terrorists' and 'criminals'. Even the most cursory glance at my Wikipedia edit history would demonstrate that I am not a sockpuppet; and you'd like to think in real life that people would carry out similarly simple checks before they threw people in jail, or worse. Well, ask Lotfi Raissi (if you'll excuse the link to wikipedia) about that.